Hey everyone,
With stablecoin regulation tightening up in different regions, how much do you think this actually affects RWA tokenization platforms (gold, real estate, bonds, etc.) that rely on stablecoins for settlement?
Are stricter rules making RWA projects safer, or just harder to run? Curious if anyone’s seen this play out with a specific project or region.
From a self-custody wallet perspective, my impression is that regulation becomes most visible at the edges: issuer redemption, fiat on/off-ramps, and regional provider availability.
An onchain token may still be transferable, while the ability to buy, redeem, or swap it can vary depending on the issuer, provider, and user’s location.
I work with Gem Wallet across BD, community, and support, and this raises an interesting UX question for us: should wallets display the issuer, underlying asset, redemption terms, and known regional limitations more clearly before someone acquires an RWA token?
If anyone has encountered this with a specific project or region, I’d be interested in the user-facing problems you experienced and can share relevant feedback with our developers.
Stablecoins are not crypto, they are CEX, a electronic currency created by a company.
Not all digital currencies are automatically crypto.