I like your proposal. Yes, I think we should use this forum.
Then… (my mind trying to propose something simple… kiss… kiss… )
why don’t we create a discourse category for it? something like:
To mimic Monero CSS, they have this workflow that we could translate into tags:
- Funding required
- Work in progress
- Completed tasks
pretty sure the list above would look lame in that the only task I know of besides the very lame litcoin block card which they insist will work and any account in the usa i make says pending…and the very, very worse game I’ve ever seen web wise litebringer LTC game they have mimblewimble only which MAY do something after 3 years and only real update in that time period…probably 4 years by the time it is done.
So they would only show the 3 above…and would not be a good look IMHO
no development money…developers go to projects the pay them before launch …so this is the
progress you get on no cash IMHO.
I’m confused. Isn’t creating an ecosystem the only way we can achieve progress and make developers work on ltc rather than anything else?
i knew some developers back in the day…they would develop new sh*tcoins for a cut of the
premine or ICO or whatever…there are not enough of them…and they don’t really work
for free anymore like back in the day. If you have the skills to program at the level of an LTC
or BTC developer…you certainly can build your own sh*tcoin if you wanted as well…that
is or was the easy part…keeping the sh*tcoin up and working etc…was the issue to get your $$$
sounds harsh, but heard this more than a few times about lack of BTC and LTC devs that are
not crypto whales with no need for money and have the skills and time
We could start using a Monero CSS proposal’s like skeleton on this forum. And find a way to build a CSS that fits this community.
For improvements, I think should consider:
- To not have a repository of ideas
- We should use Discourse forum as much as possible, including writing a simple plugin
- People should be able to contributed not being a developer
- An idea could be implemented by more people than the author
- We could integrate it to the gitlab/github workflow
- We could have more contributions from ppl outside our community, including discourse/gitlab plugins developers
I think we could do better than the example below, but this is way better than nothing.
[css] <- if we choose to write a discourse plugin to better display the proposal. --- layout: fr # i don't know what's the use for it title: Bootstrap the Litecoin Community Crowdfunding System author: Xinxi date: August 31, 2019 amount: 45 milestones: - name: Submit proposition to review funds: 0% (0 LTC) done: status: finished - name: Crowdfund the idea funds: 0% (0 LTC) done: status: finished - name: Create a spec to the system funds: 0% (0 LTC) done: status: unfinished - name: Develop the system funds: 0% (0 LTC) done: status: unfinished - name: Two-year maintenance funds: 0% (0 LTC) done: status: unfinished payouts: - date: amount: - date: amount: - date: amount: # Introduction The Litecoin team have been doing very well. Besides regular updates of the Litecoin Core repository, we activated SegWit in 2017, which helped Bitcoin greatly with its SegWit activation. [...] --- [/css]
I am trying to understand how can we build the ccs using external api’s (discourse and gitlab/github).